Categories
News

Court Gives Update In Yahaya Bello’s N110 Billion Fraud Trial

The trial of former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello on money laundering has been shifted to November 12.
The adjournment was ordered by Justice Maryann Anenih of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory after taking six witnesses.
The witnesses mainly officials of banks were called by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to give evidence in the trial.
At Thursday’s proceedings, the Prosecution first called its fifth witness, Victoria Oluwafemi, a compliance officer with Polaris Bank.
The witness told the court the total credit to the account in question, which came from different senders, adding that the transfers from the account were in multiples of N10 million.
She said the total credit in November, 2021 was N450 million.
While being cross-examined by the Counsel to Yahaya Bello (1st Defendant), Joseph Daudu, SAN, the witness admitted that she was not the accounts officer for the two accounts with her bank.

She admitted also that, because she was not the accounts officer or relationship manager, she did not know how the transactions on the accounts were carried out.

Counsel to the 3rd Defendant, AM Aliyu, while cross-examining the witness, said, “Look at the portion my learned brother showed you in Exhibit M, the name Abdulsalam Hudu did not feature there?”
 
“That is correct. Abdulsalam Hudu’s name did not feature,” she responded.
The Sixth Prosecution Witness (PW6), Mshelia Arhyel B, was then called for evidence in Chief
Daudu, SAN told the court that he had not concluded the cross-examination of the same witness in another court on a similar subject matter.
The court, however, held that the matter before it was independent and that the Defence Counsel held the discretion to cross-examine or not.
During the proceedings, the prosecution sought to tender certain documents through the subpoenaed witness.
Counsel to the 1st and 2nd Defendants Joseph Daudu SAN objected to the admissibility of the documents, arguing that they did not comply with the provisions of Sections 83 and 84 of the Evidence Act.
He further indicated his intention to address the Court more extensively on the points of objection at a later stage.
Counsel to the 3rd Defendant, Aliyu, also objected, relying on the same statutory grounds.
The prosecution counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, urged the court to discountenance the objections raised by the defence team and admit the documents in evidence.

The court admitted the document, a 218-page statement of account of Alusha Services, signed by the witness, Mshelia Arhyel, and marked P1 en bloc.

The prosecution asked similar questions posed to the same witness at the June 26, 2025 examination before Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court.
He reiterated that, prior to 2023, there was no strict withdrawal limit as long as the amount written on the cheque did not exceed ₦10 million.
The EFCC counsel told the witness to examine the transactions of the 22nd, 23rd, and 25th of February, as well as the 3rd of March, 2016, up to 6th May, 2022.
He confirmed multiple transactions of N10 million each but admitted they were within the approval threshold, putting the total transactions as at January 31, 2018 at N707,267,000.
“Please confirm that, notwithstanding the multiple withdrawals made on the same day, they were all within the approved withdrawal threshold,” prosecution counsel said.
 
“Yes, my Lord,” the witness responded.
On the account statement of Aleshua Solutions Services and transactions from May 6, 2022, the witness said the first entry was a transfer in favour of Aleshua Solutions Services by B.O. Rosemary Chukwuma, in the sum of $2,500.
“The second is a transfer in favour of Yau for $5,000. The third is also a cash transfer of $5,000 to Yau,” he stated.
The witness also confirmed certain transactions in December 2016 from the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service, totalling N202 million.
The judge indicated that the session must end at 3pm and adjourned the case to November 12 and 13, 2025, for continuation of examination of the sixth witness.
The third prosecution witness had, at the preceding hearing, said no banking regulation was breached by the defendants.
The witness, Williams Abimbola, a Compliance Officer with UBA, had also admitted not being the relationship or account manager of the Kogi Government House account, noting that the transactions were in line with stipulated guidelines.
Categories
Entertainment News

Kogi Governor, Yahaya Bello Drags Akpoti-Uduaghan To Court After Tribunal Granted Her Victory At Senatorial Election

Yahaya Bello, the Kogi State Governor, has dragged the senatorial candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the Kogi Central Senatorial District, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, to court after her victory at the Senatorial Election Tribunal.

This is coming just after the election petition tribunal sitting in Lokoja declared Akpoti-Uduaghan as the winner of the February 25 Kogi Central Senatorial election.

In the suit filed at the Kogi State High Court last week, Bello is suing Akpoti-Uduaghan for defamation.

He told the court that he was praying the court, among other demands, for an order restraining Akpoti-Uduaghan from making further statements about him and the sum of five billion naira as damages.

Other demands made by the governor include: “A declaration that the defendant’s oral interview aired on Arise on the 4th day of November 2022 which described the Claimant as a murderer, killer, perpetrator of evil acts and a terror to the people Kogi State is capable of and indeed, has lowered the Claimant the estimation of right-thinking members of the society.

“An order of this honourable court compelling the defendant to within 48 hours of the order of this court, publish in five (5) national dailies and also grant broadcast statement in Arise TV, AIT, NTA and Channel TV platforms, a retraction of her frivolous allegations and also tender unreserved apology to the Claimant for the defamatory statements and comments made against him.

“An order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendant either acting by herself, or through agents, privies, associates, howsoever described from any publication or further broadcast of the defamatory words and statements complained of or any other similar libelous articles about the claimant or in any other manner, or online, on print or social media, or say or produce any other material on TV or radio which is capable of defaming the claimant.

“An award of the sum of Five Billion (N5,000,000,000.00) Naira only as damages against the Defendant but in favour of the Claimant for the defamatory Broadcast on Arise TV Platform made on the 4th day of November 2022.

“Cost of litigation of five hundred million (N500,000,000) naira only against the defendant.”

SaharaReporters had in July reported that Akpoti-Uduaghan sued the Bello for defamation and linking her to terrorism activities in the state.

Also charged with the governor in the suit numbered FCT/HC/CV/6529/2023 are the Kogi State Government, the state information and communications commissioner, Kingsley Fanwo, and Vanguard Media Limited.

The state government had called on heads of security agencies in Nigeria to invite Akpoti-Uduaghan for questioning over alleged terrorism capable of dragging the state back to “the dark era.”

It said despite Governor Bello’s interventions to rid the state of terrorism, it was concerned that some politicians were grooming terrorists in the state as well as importing them from neighbouring states.

Akpoti-Uduaghan is demanding the sum of N110billion in damages and an order restraining Bello from using defamatory words against her.